<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s New?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rowenameager.com/2009/05/31/whats-new/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rowenameager.com/2009/05/31/whats-new/</link>
	<description>Barrister &#38; Property Law Lecturer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:52:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proprietary Estoppel Revisited &#171; Rowena Meager&#39;s Property Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://rowenameager.com/2009/05/31/whats-new/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Proprietary Estoppel Revisited &#171; Rowena Meager&#39;s Property Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rowenameager.com/?p=70#comment-55</guid>
		<description>[...] Lords&#8217; decision in Thorner v Majors [2009] UKHL 18 (for an earlier discussion of this case see here) the High Court has, in MacDonald &amp; Bannigan v Frost [2009] EWHC 2276 (Ch) (no link yet),  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lords&#8217; decision in Thorner v Majors [2009] UKHL 18 (for an earlier discussion of this case see here) the High Court has, in MacDonald &amp; Bannigan v Frost [2009] EWHC 2276 (Ch) (no link yet),  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Town &#38; Village Greens &#171; Rowena Meager&#39;s Property Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://rowenameager.com/2009/05/31/whats-new/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>New Town &#38; Village Greens &#171; Rowena Meager&#39;s Property Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rowenameager.com/?p=70#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] nec precario (without force, without stealth and without permission) which is discussed briefly below in the context of a recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Lewis v Redcar. However, rather more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nec precario (without force, without stealth and without permission) which is discussed briefly below in the context of a recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Lewis v Redcar. However, rather more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
